On-Track
Collision Fatalities
January
12, 2007
Brothers and Sisters,
The following is an important news item from yesterday's Boston
Globe.
Two fellow Teamster Brothers were killed in this 'on - track'
collision. Though this catastophe happened on an American road,
it could just as easily have occurred here.
Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families of these men tragically
cut down while safely performing their duties, and we pray for
a speedy and full recovery for those injured.
Even though the investigation is not complete, it appears all
required precautions were put in place by the maintenance crew.
However it was not enough to insure their safety. They did everything
that they knew to do and believed that they were safe, but they
weren't.
Where our lives are at stake, as they are everyday on the track,
there must be no room or availability for human error. No matter
what the cost, all systems must have adequate failsafes and protections
built in to insure that if a mistake is made, it gets caught so
that we can make it home alive.
Stay safe out there and stay aware, there is too much at stake
otherwise.
Fraternally,
Bill Brehl
President
TCRC MWED
***
Human error probed in T crash
Warning signal was set incorrectly
By
Mac Daniel and Raja Mishra, Globe Staff | January 11, 2007
Investigators
ruled out mechanical problems yesterday as the cause of the fatal
commuter train crash in Woburn and are focusing on how human error
put the Boston-bound train on a collision course with a work crew.
Two
workers were killed and four were injured, while 10 passengers
suffered minor injuries, as the train rammed the repair vehicle
and ground to a halt Tuesday.
"We're
focusing on several aspects of [the] human element, but there
are several people that help operate a railroad," said Ted
Turpin, lead investigator for the National Transportation Safety
Board. He would not say whether the actions of more than one person
were being investigated.
Federal
investigators are trying to determine why a routine procedure
to protect the work crew broke down, resulting in the crash. Earlier
Tuesday, eight commuter trains passed the track repair work site
without incident. But before the next train approached, a warning
signal and a switch that would have diverted the train to another
set of tracks were not set correctly.
An
unidentified dispatcher in the rail system's Somerville control
center, who has been placed on administrative leave, was overseeing
the procedure. But investigators said they have not yet determined
who might be at fault.
Rick
Inclima, safety director for the repair workers union, said it
appears the six-man work crew did everything they could to ensure
their safety.
"Some
problem with the dispatch center will prove to be the case,"
he said yesterday. "Clearly, the protections were in place.
The work crew expected that train on the other track and had moved
out of the way, and, lo and behold, the catastrophe happened."
Officials
with the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees said the
accident underscored safety problems in the MBTA commuter rail
system since a private consortium started running it in 2003.
Federal
records show that four worker fatalities, including the two Tuesday,
have occurred on the 13-line system since the Massachusetts Bay
Commuter Railroad began a $1.07 billion contract with the Massachusetts
Bay Transportation Authority. In December 2003, a worker was struck
and killed as he cleared snow at the Wellesley Farms station platform.
In June 2006, a 36-year-old worker was crushed to death by track
maintenance machinery in Gloucester.
In
the preceding seven years, under Amtrak's control, only one worker
was killed on the job, according to Federal Railroad Administration
records, which do not go back further than 1996. In 1997, a train
struck a work crew in Concord.
"We
are sickened by this tragedy and appalled by the safety record
of the MBCR," said Freddie Simpson, the union's president.
"This is abhorrent and totally unacceptable."
A
commuter rail spokesman said yesterday that the four deaths under
MBCR management were unrelated and do not reflect a safety problem.
"MBCR
has taken great pains to implement safety training programs, systems
safeguards, and, in some cases, daily safety reminders for workers,
" said spokesman Scott Farmelant. "But none of this
will prevent human error."
The
crash resulted from an extremely rare breakdown of a process that
occurs almost daily: dispatchers routing trains around repair
crews and other work sites.
Tuesday
morning, the work crew was authorized to be on the inbound tracks
to repair ties between Mishawum Station and the Montvale Avenue
crossing in Woburn. The crew began work around 9 a.m., after the
morning rush, and was scheduled to be there until 3 p.m., MBTA
officials said.
There
are two parallel sets of tracks, one for inbound trains to Boston,
one for those outbound to Lowell. The dispatcher overseeing the
Boston-Lowell line, who began work at 7 a.m. and was scheduled
to leave at 3 p.m., kept outbound trains on their regular tracks.
Inbound trains were routed around the workers by triggering a
track switcher located about 3 miles north of the work site that
moved them to the outbound tracks. Once the inbound trains were
safely past the site, they were switched back to the inbound tracks
by the dispatcher.
According
to T officials, the switches north and south of the work site
were toggled back and forth throughout the morning as four inbound
trains made their runs around the work crew using the outbound
tracks. While four outbound trains did not switch tracks, they
were under the same speed restriction. Officials said there were
no problems reported with the track signals or switching equipment.
But
the dispatcher kept inbound train No. 322 on the inbound tracks
through the work site, officials said. In addition, a red track
signal, which alerts train crews to an occupied track and warns
them to slow down, was switched to green, indicating that the
track was clear and that there was no speed restriction, they
said. Shortly before 2 p.m., the train barreled toward the unsuspecting
work crew at close to the 60-mile-per-hour speed limit, officials
said.
Asked
if the investigation was focusing on the actions of the dispatcher,
MBTA spokesman Joe Pesaturo said only that it remained an ongoing
probe.
NTSB
investigators plan to interview the dispatcher tomorrow. The dispatcher
has been interviewed by other investigators, and, like everyone
else involved, was being tested for drug and alcohol use, Turpin
said. He said that he interviewed other workers in the dispatching
center, the maintenance department, and their union representatives
yesterday.
Investigators
have also collected the digital records of each switch action
from the Somerville dispatch center and have downloaded data from
the locomotive to determine engine speed and torque, officials
said.
Daniel
can be reached at mdaniel@globe.com; Mishra at rmishra@globe.com.