| Home | News | Contact info/Executive Board | TCRC MWED By-Laws and Local Lodge Governance | Pictures | Links | E-Mail |
| Health & Safety Representatives | Safety | Version Française |

20 minute lunch breaks - Update

January 30th, 2007

Brothers and Sisters,

On December 3rd, 2006, following a session of bargaining with CPRail, I wrote to you concerning the application of article 8.4 of wage agreement 41:

"... It was surprising to hear a senior manager, for example, state that our members do not have to take lunch between the 5th and 6th hour. Needless to say, we took exception to this and confronted him with the actually wording of the Collective Agreement. He then explained that he knows our members are working through their 20 minute paid lunches on the TP&E, but that they voluntarily do that to help out their supervisors and to "..increase production", not because of intimidation or outright refusal to let them stop (even though the members actually working on these crews say the opposite).

As disturbing as comments like this are, they at least give us a chance to deal with them and educate these people as to their responsibilities under the collective agreement. After all, it is the 21st century. We are not in indentured servitude. By the company's own admission, the production on TP&E across the country is better than it has ever been, so why would they feel that they can deny someone the simple comfort of stopping for twenty minutes between the 5th and 6th hour and eating their lunch in peace? After all, it is clearly within the Collective Agreement.

I mean, what reasonable person actually believes that men and women who do hard physical labour for over ten hours every day and are entitled by contract to a 20 minute paid lunch, will all voluntarily give this up, out of the goodness of their hearts, to help increase their supervisor's bonus? Well, one manager not only professed to believe this, he actually tried to pass it off (unsuccessfully) as fact to the people who work on these crews..."

After this round of bargaining, on November 30th, I sent a letter to the company to inform them that we would no longer accept the practice of them disallowing our members to stop for lunch. I also initiated the attached grievance on December 5th, 2007. Forty two (42) days later the company responded (also attached).

As you can see from the company's response, they are overruling Mr. Manconi's position and agreeing that the 20 minute meal break will be within the 5th and 6th hours and will be during a time when no service will be required. This means that there will be no more having to eat 'on the go'. If you are working under the '20 minute' lunch rule, you will be allowed to stop work, sit down, relax and eat for 20 minutes at a point within the 5th and 6th hours of service.

For example, if you start at 0700, then between 1200 and 1400 will have 20 minutes off work. In this scenario, the latest that your lunch could begin would be 13:40.

As the company is allowed to decide which 20 minute block you will get (within the 5th and 6th hours), they will be responsible for informing you when you will get lunch. We do not have a problem with this being done daily (preferably at the job briefing).

If anyone working under the 20 minute rule of 8.4, is not informed when their lunch will be or is not allowed to take their lunch within the 5th and 6th hours, please inform your Director as soon as possible.

Though both human decency and the collective agreement are clear in how this rule should have been applied, because certain supervisors and managers were trying to squeeze as much out of you as they could get away with, our membership was denied this simple guaranteed right. I am still surprised that they made us grieve it. But Mr. Manconi was adamant. So we grieved it.

And now we have clear language on how this article is to be applied. I am grateful that there are still company managers who have the integrity and common sense to resolve grievances like this. I only hope that someone with authority takes a closer look at the other managers. The ones who make the decisions which cause these grievances to be initiated. Perhaps they would realize a little education may be in order.

Stay safe, stay strong, stay united.


Bill Brehl
President
TCRC MWED

Bullet Teamsters Union Releases Shocking Video Footage of Picket Line Arrests by CP Rail Police Force >>>
Bullet Charges Under Article XIX, Section 8 of the IBT Constitution >>>
Bullet Cool Links >>>
Bullet Meeting with MP Sukh Dhaliwal >>>
Bullet

Pacific Region Newsletter
Bullet A letter to Fred Green >>>
Bullet Message from Lou Viani >>>
Bullet Messages from other Unions >>>
Bullet Ratification Letter - Will be mailed by or before June 18th >>>
Bullet Big win for unions as ruling says bargaining protected >>>
Bullet June 6, 2007 Memorandum of Settlement >>>
Bullet Dealing with Strikebreakers >>>
Bullet Thanks to the Minister of Labour >>>
Bullet CPR Settlement >>>
Bullet Return to work for CP employees>>>
Bullet We have tentative agreement>>>
Bullet CPRail Agreement reached >>>
Bullet BC FED letter to the Prime Minister >>>
Bullet PICKET LINE KENORA >>>
Bullet Talks on June 4th >>>
Bullet

Letter from Robert Bouvier >>>

Bullet All those who are concerned about the rights of labor union members should contact CP Rail in Canada and protest >>>
Bullet

An unsolicited response >>>

Bullet

Court update from Coquitlam >>>

Bullet

Meeting in Ottawa on Monday >>>

Bullet

CP Rail going to court over "illegal arrest" >>>

Bullet

Message from Sudbury >>>

Bullet

Picket line arrests merit public inquiry >>>

Bullet CP Rail going to court over "illegal arrest". >>>
Bullet SOSA Belleville Sub Pickets and Support >>>
Bullet Picketers arrested >>>
News Archives >>>